Arts pricing and public funding

Have you ever liked a work of art (and here and here) very much but felt that the community, museum or government that had commissioned it paid too much for it?

This exactly what happened to me when I learned about the 750,000 euros the Flemish people paid for the 2006 water sculpture Diepe Fontein which reflects the façade of the Royal Museum of Fine Arts when full.

A fraction of the money spent (I cannot remember the exact details but if I remember well the proportion was about 10%) was used for the actual production of the piece. The majority of the money went to Spanish contemporary artist Cristina Iglesias (1956, San Sebastián, Spain) who was primarily rewarded for her intellectual property.

This article by Prof. Paul Ilegems (born 1946, curator of the Friet-museum in Antwerp) has the best description of the work. It mentions that the idea to invite Iglesias to design this work was by architect Hilde Daems, together with Paul Robbrecht and Marie-José Van Hee who had been at that time responsible for the re-design of the Leopold De Waelplaats. Ilegems mentions how the work is huftervrij, which is a Dutch term that translates as shitheadproof and denotes vandal proof. Vandalism is a big problem in public space art and it has been of recent interest in Antwerpen. Cel Crabeels’s article on the destruction of Dan Graham’s public space artwork Funhouse for Children (1998) on the Antwerp Sint – Jansplein documents this.

As I mentioned before, the main gripe I have with the work of art is not necessarily the price of it, but the fact that only a small fraction of the cost was for the actual production of the work. I specifically want to compare Diepe Fontein to another 2006 work of art, even if the work I am referring to was ‘only’ an ephemeral performance by a French company who is called Royale de Luxe. They produce the best piece of street theatre I have ever had the pleasure of witnessing: The Sultan’s Elephant. Its performance cost the Antwerp municipality 800,000 euros but the majority of it went to the actual performance (which lasted three days and were extravagant and deeply moving), not just a concept. I saw grown men and women weep with joy and awe. Watch it here if they did not come to your town last summer.

See also the sociology of art and on government funding of art.

7 thoughts on “Arts pricing and public funding”

  1. Bruno

    I believe you are missing a few points in your analysis.

    First of all your comparison between the two cultural works is a little bit difficult as The Sultan’s Elephant was a onetime event (performance art) while the Deep Fountain is something that is supposed to last for a long time (as I understand it). This immediately makes the difference between a service and a product which are two completely different things in valuation.

    Second you are trying to value the piece of art/culture on the amusement factor that people experienced (“I saw grown men and women weep with joy and awe.”). Ofcourse while amusement (or a little broader: appreciation) is an important factor, it is by far not the only factor on which you can base the valuation.

    Ofcourse the valuation of a piece of art is always dubious and might even cause some uproar but that is mainly due to the subjective relation people have with art or the particular art form. Whether the money spent is used for actual performance or for intellectual property in my mind does not matter. However the performance of a nonprofit organisation is ofcourse much more likely to be appreciated than that of an individual artist who seems to make a lot of money out of it.

    BrunoD

  2. Mike

    unrelated to this post, but as a response to your comment in my blog:

    I ended up seeing the film as a bootleg; but I just got word that it’s not available on French DVD entitled “Erotica anthologie volume 1.” It’s available from http://www.chaletfilms.com/dvd/920-Erotica:_anthologie__vol.1.html

    There’s also a short by Ado Kyrou on the DVD, so I plan on picking it up whenever I get a chance. If you don’t mind watching short films on your computer, it turns out that an internet acquiantance of my uploaded the short film; it’s available .

  3. jahsonic

    Dear Bruno,

    Thanks for your comment.

    I wanted to make two points clear:

    * I think it’s bad when artists/or_anyone_else are paid too much for intellectual property.
    * My enormous appreciation for the Sultan’s Elephant

    I checked your work and liked it, beware of the green-eyed monster called SABAM though.

    Jan

  7. ombresblanches

    I like his blog very much. Great photos, great choice of films and the name sounds pretty good.
    As for the Bouyxou festival: This is really interesting and arcane stuff.
    Andrej

Comments are closed.