Category Archives: eroticism

Destricted (2006) – Various

Destricted (2006) – Various

If you live in the vicinity of Antwerp, don’t miss your only chance to see Destricted on the big screen this year. It played today (I missed it) but also tomorrow and on Sunday. More info here.

Destricted is a series of seven short fiction films addressing each director’s views on the intimate connections between sex, contemporary art and pornography. Directors include Marina Abramoviæ, Matthew Barney, Larry Clark and Gaspar Noé.

Update Feb 18, 2006: what a total waste of time, a collection of films about modernist alienation, boring except for the Matthew Barney excerpt, which was quite beautiful and intriguing, the rise of the ‘male member’ was precious.

Al haar vleesch wilde hem

Lodewijk van Deyssel (1864-1952)

Excuse us for this Dutch post on Dutch naturalist writer Lodewijk van Deyssel. The excerpt below is from a first ongekuiste (unexpurgated) version of Een Liefde (A Love) (1887).

Fragment uit “Een liefde” (Uit de ongekuiste eerste versie)

pag. 188:
“Zij zag weer Jozefs twee bruine oogen, twee lichtpunten die naar haar toe schitterden, maar oogen van vroeger, de oogen van den doode, die niet óok waren in dien man hier in huis.
Zij ging weer op bed liggen, met haar bonzende hoofd, in haar koorts van wild begeeren. Haar beenen lagen wijd van elkaâr, met opgetrokken knieën. Haar oogen hingen zwaar en heet. Nu zou hij komen, nu zou hij komen, de zachte groote man, al haar vleesch wilde hem, haar heete mond, haar levende geslachtsdeel. Zij was hier, met haar armen, met haar beenen, om hem te ontvangen en hem aan haar vast te klemmen. Waarom kwam hij niet? Zij voelde hem niet in haar bed, zij voelde hem niet in haar lichaam komen. Zij richtte zich op en luisterde, als moest zij hem van ver hooren naderen. Maar alles bleef stil, totdat zij éens Jozef hoorde bewegen en hoesten, die achter den wand in zijn bed lag. Was hij dat, was hij daar? Neen, dat was de andere, het namaaksel van haar man. Dien moest zij niet hebben. En de heelen nacht eilde zij door, in een half-wakenden, half-slapenden toestand, in verschrikkingen, die het bede deden kantelen en de kamer instorten over haar hoofd, in droomen van zware blokken, die over haar lijf vielen, en van een God den Vader, een grijsaard met een langen baard en een kroon op zijn hoofd, die zachtjes tot haar afdaalde, maar dan onvoelbaar werd als een geest en in rook verwolkte om haar heen.”

Commentaar:

Een fragment als dit kan naturalistisch genoemd worden door de overmaat aan uiterst precieze beschrijvingen van alle gevoelsnuances, het impressionistische taalgebruik vol neologismen en bijvoeglijke naamwoorden; maar ook door de ongekuiste (voor die tijd dus schokkende) beschrijving van het lichamelijke.

Lodewijk van Deyssel heeft in de tweede uitgaven van zijn boek passages als deze vrijwillig gekuist, omdat er een storm van protest losbarstte. —source

Introducing Jules Michelet (1798 – 1874)

This is an updated version of a 2007 post. Hardly anything remains of the original post.

I first came across Jules Michelet by way of Georges Bataille’s Literature and Evil (1957), where Michelet is one of the subjects. This was in the early 2000s, the early days of the internet, when there were still interesting sites and blogs.

Häxan (1922)

In my original post on Michelet, I gave one of the illustrations by Martin van Maële, some of which can be found here[1]. Van Maele, I wrote, is a student from Felicien Rops.

In that post, I also mentioned Jack Stevenson’s book on Häxan which confirms that the director Christensen was influenced by Jules Michelet’s book.

In that post, I mentioned Georges Bataille who said about Michelet was “one of those who spoke most humanely about evil”, a citation that comes from Literature and Evil.

But did I really?

Is it not equally possible that I discovered Michelet via Häxan (1922), said to be the first exploitation film and both based on Malleus Maleficarum (1487) and La sorcière (1862) by Jules Michelet.

Upon researching this in 2021, 14 years after my original post, it has come to my attention that Jules Michelet’s La sorcière, known in English as Satanism and Witchcraft, a Study in Medieval Superstition, is a work of proto-feminism and anti-clericalism. 

I know it when I see it

“In a tantalizing and increasing tempo, the sex appetite is whetted and lascivious thoughts and lustful desires are intensely stimulated.”

 

Opening credits to Louis Malle’s 1958 film about adultery: Les Amants. Notice the ‘dangerous river’ (rivière dangereuse) and the ‘indifferent lake’ (lac d’indifférence).

Jeanne Moreau to the left, pictures sourced here.

Les Amants (The Lovers) is a 1958 French film directed by Louis Malle and starring Jeanne Moreau. It was Malle’s second feature film, made when he was 25 years old.

A showing of the film in Cleveland, Ohio resulted in a series of court battles that led to a Supreme Court decision on obscenity issues and judge Potter Stewart’s famous “I know it when I see it” opinion about what the definition of obscenity is. Usually dropped from the quote is the remainder of that sentence, “and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”

A daringly frank novel

I’ve updated my page on adultery, and especially adultery in literature and happened upon this picture of a 1956 Signet edition of Alberto Moravia’s novel Conjugal Love, which I’ve sort of reviewed here. Signet is an imprint of the American paperback publisher New American Library.

Some comments on the wording on the jacket by antydiluvian:

Note the puffery from 1956: “A daringly frank novel.” This meant that if there was an adulteress in it, she didn’t die at the end. Or if she did it was from something not directly related to sex. What the woman did with her lover(s) was left to the imagination, of course — no “frankness” there. Any book that was translated from the French, Swedish, or (as in this case) Italian might be called “daringly frank” simply because anything written in those languages was automatically regarded as racy. And “complete and unabridged” meant that any scenes of actual European “frankness” in the novel were left intact for its American readers — which wasn’t always the case in those days.

I don’t know if any of you have checked IMDb keyword tool, but for Moravia you get this, which explains why Moravia’s work is classified as naturalistic, and also why I have come to like his work over the years.

Bill Marx writes in Alberto Moravia’s kinky, subversive realism is back in print:

“In the 1940s and ’50s, Italian novelist Alberto Moravia achieved international acclaim as a kinky realist whose Marxist-inspired moralism detailed the paralysis of the middle-class ego in the face of cultural and political collapse. Before and just after World War II, Moravia analyzed the blight of fascism; during the Cold War era he explored the spiritual costs of capitalism. What distinguishes Moravia from most other writers of politically inspired fiction, however, is that he was a popular novelist, his wide appeal rooted in his frank depictions of love and sexuality. Like Ignazio Silone, Moravia bore historical witness to the century’s horrors, but his fiction’s sleek dovetailing of Marx and Freud exposed the West’s inertia through the tortured curbs and caprices of the libido. The marketability of sex made the subversiveness of his critique palatable: Moravia’s books sold more than one million copies in the United States during the buttoned-up 1940s and ’50s.” —source

Incidentally Moravia’s work came to my attention in the early 2000s via Cédric Kahn’s excellent film L’ Ennui (1998). If you read more of Moravia — he is often considered the most popular Italian novelist outside Italy and his novels have been filmed lots of times in cinematic modernism — , you get the impression that there is nothing as exciting as an unfaithful wife, I tend to agree. It reminds me of a quote I read in one of the early issues of Mondo 2000 magazine. It went: “when you come to realize that safe sex is boring sex.”

A new Bible for the white race

The Origins of Love and Hate (1910 – 1965) – Ian Dishart Suttie

The White Goddess: A Historical Grammar of Poetic Myth (1948) – Robert Graves
[Amazon.com]
[FR] [DE] [UK]

 

I can’t remember how I happened (oh yes, now I do, search terms used matrist+patrist, see my previous post on the work of Gordon Rattray Taylor) but I found this interesting text by the recently deceased Robert Anton Wilson on the relationship between James Joyce and Eastern philosophy. Some excerpts:

Throughout the long day of Ulysses the thoughts of Stephen Dedalus and Mr. Bloom repeatedly return to the East; and this is not without reason. Ulysses is so profoundly Oriental in mood and conception that Carl Jung has recommended it as a new Bible for the white race. Molly Bloom’s fervent “Yes” mirrors the author’s acceptance of life in its entirety – an acceptance that transcends the dualisms of light and dark, good and evil, beautiful and sordid.

Some Sinologists trace this “Eternal Female” back to a Chinese “Urmutter” myth of pre-Chou times, but Lao-Tse was far beyond primitive mythology. He was using this myth as a pointer, to indicate the values that must have been in the society which created the myth. The distinction between Patrist and Matrist cultures made in such books as Ian Suttie’s The Origins of Love and Hate and G. Rattray Taylor’s Sex in History (not to mention Robert Graves’ The White Goddess ) places the Taoists as representatives of a Matrist social-ethical system living in Confucian Patrist China. —cached source

Molly Bloom’s fervent “Yes” from her famous soliloquy:

“…I was a Flower of the mountain yes when I put the rose in my hair like the Andalusian girls used or shall I wear a red yes and how he kissed me under the Moorish wall and I thought well as well him as another and then I asked him with my eyes to ask again yes and then he asked me would I yes to say yes my mountain flower and first I put my arms around him yes and drew him down to me so he could feel my breasts all perfume yes and his heart was going like mad and yes I said yes I will Yes. “

Banana woman and a gentle devil

Banana Woman

Banana Woman

A Kind Devil

A Kind Devil

Both works by Lucio Bubacco (b. 1957) , an Italian Murano glass artist. His sensual work is steeped in mythology and is erotically flavoured. A distinct series of pieces has slight sadomasochistic iconography. I saw his work today at the Alfabetagaga gallery here in Antwerp. One more link before I go. I love wikis and I love eroticism. Someone’s started a wiki (based on MediaWiki, a CMS I’m looking into for future Jahsonic developments) dedicated to big breasts. The site is called Boobpedia and is nsfw. A clear distinction is made between natural and fake breasts.

Dian Hanson on the big-breast lover:

There’s something very lovable about the big-breast lover. They tend to be open, outgoing, physical, accepting of the flaws of women, happy with the functioning female body. They like the body that gets pregnant. They like the body that gives birth. They like the body that lactates. There wasn’t the picky demand for perfection. They tended to be more rural men. They tended to live in the red states rather than the blue states. They were often slightly less educated. They were the kind of guys who in their personal ads would say, “Fats welcomed! All ages okay!” They loved mom. –Dian Hanson (2005)

Also today on Radio Centraal, Antwerp’s non-commercial independent radio station, a show by Pierre Elitair on the mid eighties revival of mid sixties garage rock with bands such the Swedish Nomads (‘The Way you Touch my Hand’), the Fuzztones, the Belgian Paranoiacs and his favourite: The Lyres (‘I want to help you Ann’).

Groping each other in a car

After treating us to a review [nsfw] of Japanese cult film The Bedroom (Hisayasu Sato, 1992), Mike now turns our attention to the cult classic of the pink film era The Embryo Hunts in Secret. It would make an ideal double bill with Blind Beast.

Mike says:

“The film opens with a man and woman passionately groping each other in a car; outside, it is pouring down rain. The man grabs for the woman’s sex, but she denies him the pleasure, insisting that they go inside. The man takes the woman to his apartment. It turns out that the man is the owner of a department store where Yuka, the woman, works in the men’s clothing department as a sale girl. The two know little about each other, other than what is knowable from an outsider perspective; they know their power relations in the business, and they know they are attracted to each other. “

See also Youtube clip of Blind Beast vs Killer Dwarf by Teruo Ishii and this German trailer of the unforgettable 1988 Tetsuo.

Lastly, this looks surreal, from a film that is not as good as the poster shown below:


The Last Supper (2005) – Osamu Fukutani

More films seen last week: Brice de Nice, an ejoyable silly French comedy; Le Dîner de cons, a very funny and dark French comedy; Pan’s Labyrinth, a diabolical version of Alice in Wonderland and a tribute to the fantastique and the magnificent trailer for David Lynch’s INLAND EMPIRE. Curious about: Terry Gilliam’s Tideland and Rampo Noir. Of the last a picture:

Rampo Noir

 

Why Bush won

Sex in history (1954) – Gordon Rattray Taylor [Amazon.com] [FR] [DE] [UK]

[About] 50 years ago, a book was published which accurately predicted the results of the 2004 [North American] election. No, this wasn’t a book of psychic predictions. It was a book called “Sex in History” by Gordon Rattray Taylor, a sociologist. In this book, he talked about how societies swing back and forth between two tendencies, each of which places particular prominence on one of the genders. The patrist side is the ascendant male, and the matrist side is more focused on the female. Comparing characteristics of the two cultural tendencies looks almost exactly like a comparison of the platforms of the Republican and Democratic parties.

Patrist Matrist
Restrictive attitude to sex Permissive attitude to sex
Limitation of freedom for women Freedom for women
Women seen as inferior, sinful Women accorded high status
Chastity more valued than welfare Welfare more valued than chastity.
Politically authoritarian Politically egalitarian
Conservative: against innovation Progressive: revolutionary
Distrust of research, enquiry No distrust of research
Inhibition, fear of spontaneity Spontaneity: exhibition
Deep fear of homosexuality Deep fear of incest
Sex differences maximised Sex differences minimised
Asceticism, fear of pleasure Hedonism, pleasure welcomed
Father religion
eg. “Thou shall not break the Ten Commandments or you will burn in hell”
Mother religion
eg. “God is all loving, all forgiving and all understanding”

HMMM… I WONDER WHICH ONE OF THESE WON THE ELECTION…?

Seriously though. This is probably the single-most accurate model to explain why Bush won. It fits in precisely with what I wrote yesterday about how Bush’s people tapped into the fear of the average male that their cultural importance was at risk.

Keywords in contemporary culture which denote matrist values are, “feminism,” “metrosexual,” and “equal rights”. Keywords which currently denote a more Patrist attitude are “family values,” “traditional values,” “fundamentalism”. —Pop Occulture